Published 17 September 2021
Sentencing — male assaults female — failure to answer police bail — posting harmful digital communication — threatening to damage property — Police v Carr [2018] NZDC 15609 — Police v Valli [2017] NZDC 17182 — Police v Rose [2017] NZDC 690 — Rose v Police [2017] NZHC 3283 — Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015. The defendant appeared for sentence having pleaded guilty to charges of male assaults female, failure to answer police bail, posting a harmful digital communication, and threatening to damage property. He had thrown a phone at the first victim and also punched her in the face. He then failed to answer police bail in relation to this charge. The second two charges related to a second victim. He posted naked photos of her on Facebook and also threatened to damage her mother's car. The Court set a start point of six months' imprisonment on the harmful digital communications charge, with two-month uplifts on each of the remaining three charges. With a 25 per cent discount for guilty plea, the final sentence was eight months' imprisonment. The Court also made a protection order in favour of the first victim. Judgment Date: 6 June 2019.
This website explains many of the things you might want to know if you are coming to the Youth Court, or just wondering how the Youth Court works.
Visit website›Ministry of Justice website with information on family issues including about going to court, forms and other times when you may need help.
Visit website›For information about courts and tribunals, including going to court, finding a court & collection of fines and reparation.
Visit website›On this site you will find information about our Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court including recent decisions, daily lists and news.
Visit website›