Published 18 April 2024
Pretrial — admissibility of evidence — propensity evidence — Evidence Act 2006 ss 40, 41, 42, 43 — Hetherington v R [2012] NZCA 88. The defendant was on trial for 16 charges arising out of two events, including kidnapping, wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, male assaults female and threatening to kill. The victim of this offending was the defendant's partner. The prosecution sought to introduce the defendant's previous conviction for male assaults female, the victim of which was also his partner at the time. The defense opposed the application, submitting that the previous conviction did not establish a pattern and was unfairly prejudicial. The Court accepted that the previous conviction qualified as propensity evidence, but decided that if the evidence was admitted it would have an unfairly prejudicial effect against the defendant. The application was refused and the evidence was ruled inadmissible. Judgment Date: 1 June 2023
This website explains many of the things you might want to know if you are coming to the Youth Court, or just wondering how the Youth Court works.
Visit website›Ministry of Justice website with information on family issues including about going to court, forms and other times when you may need help.
Visit website›For information about courts and tribunals, including going to court, finding a court & collection of fines and reparation.
Visit website›On this site you will find information about our Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court including recent decisions, daily lists and news.
Visit website›