Published 08 September 2021
Sentencing — operating a drone in a manner causing unnecessary endangerment — failing to give way to and keep clear of a manned aircraft — midair collision — discharge without conviction — Civil Aviation Act 1990, s 44 — Sentencing Act 2002, ss 106 & 107 — Civil Aviation Rule 101.213(a). The defendant appeared for sentence on charges of operating a drone in a manner causing unnecessary endangerment, and while operating a drone failing to give way to and keep clear of a manned aircraft. He had been flying a drone at a beach popular with paragliders. The defendant failed to take sufficient care while doing so, and caused a midair collision with one of the paragliders. The pilot of the paraglider managed to land without injury. The defendant applied for a discharge without conviction, arguing that a conviction would threaten his career prospects, travel plans and mental health. The Court considered that none of these factors warranted granting a discharge without conviction, and declined the application. The start point for sentence was a fine of $2000. With discounts for previous good character, remorse and future prospects, the final amount of fine was $1000. Judgment Date: 18 February 2021
This website explains many of the things you might want to know if you are coming to the Youth Court, or just wondering how the Youth Court works.
Visit website›Ministry of Justice website with information on family issues including about going to court, forms and other times when you may need help.
Visit website›For information about courts and tribunals, including going to court, finding a court & collection of fines and reparation.
Visit website›On this site you will find information about our Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court including recent decisions, daily lists and news.
Visit website›