Published 30 October 2018
Application to admit propensity evidence — relationship propensity evidence — domestic violence — male assaults female — Evidence Act 2006, s 43 — Mahomed v R [2011] NZSC 52 — Perkins v R [2011] NZCA 665 — R v Potaka-Alexander [2012] NZHC 1958 — M v R [2013] NZCA 239. The police sought to adduce relationship propensity evidence against the defendant that demonstrated the true nature and context of the relationship between the complainant and the defendant; that the defendant was controlling and abusive. The proposed propensity evidence was to show that the defendant would become wound up about something, call and abuse the complainant before eventually going to her home whilst the complainant would try to anticipate him arriving and leave to avoid him. The court found that the proposed relationship propensity evidence was critical to the issues to be determined at trial, noting that the allegations could not be dealt with in a vacuum, and allowed the evidence to be admitted as the risk of prejudice was reduced by the fact that the defendant was to be tried by a Judge alone. The proposed evidence was declared to be admissible. Judgment Date: 7 March 2018.
This website explains many of the things you might want to know if you are coming to the Youth Court, or just wondering how the Youth Court works.
Visit website›Ministry of Justice website with information on family issues including about going to court, forms and other times when you may need help.
Visit website›For information about courts and tribunals, including going to court, finding a court & collection of fines and reparation.
Visit website›On this site you will find information about our Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court including recent decisions, daily lists and news.
Visit website›