Published 20 September 2016
Protest to jurisdiction — application to set aside — District Courts Rules 2014, r 5.51 — District Courts Act 1947, s 29 — Spiliada Maritime Corporation v Cansulex Limited [1987] AC 460 — Gilmore v Gilmore [1993] NZFLR 561 (HC). An application to set aside an objection to jurisdiction was granted. The objection was filed under r 5.51 of the Rules, but on consideration of s 29 of the Act the Court did have jurisdiction. A forum non conveniens argument was also considered in light of the House of Lords case “Spiliada” and the New Zealand case “Gilmore”. On the principles of law in those cases and the facts of this case, New Zealand was the correct jurisdiction to determine the main proceedings. Judgment Date: 16 March 2016.
This website explains many of the things you might want to know if you are coming to the Youth Court, or just wondering how the Youth Court works.
Visit website›Ministry of Justice website with information on family issues including about going to court, forms and other times when you may need help.
Visit website›For information about courts and tribunals, including going to court, finding a court & collection of fines and reparation.
Visit website›On this site you will find information about our Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court including recent decisions, daily lists and news.
Visit website›