Published 24 June 2019
Application to give evidence by video link — witness fears of intimidation — Evidence Act 2006, ss 102A, 103, 105 & 106 — Courts Remote Participation Act 2010, s 12 — Wealleans v R [2015] NZCA 353 — R v O [2012] NZCA 475. The defendant was charged, along with a co-offender, of conspiring to defeat the course of justice. The Crown intended to call the co-offender as a witness in the defendant's trial, and applied for him to be able to give evidence remotely via a video link. The co-offender was incarcerated in the Otago Corrections Facility, and the Crown argued that if he was transferred to Canterbury Prison in order to give evidence, his safety would be in danger from the defendant and associates of the defendant. The defendant argued that the co-offender should give evidence in Court, and that the Canterbury Prison could take measures to protect him. The Court found that the co-offender had genuine concerns for his safety. Safety concerns are recognised in the legislation as a reason to allow witnesses to give evidence in an alternative way. The Court ruled that the co-offender be allowed to give evidence via a video link.
This website explains many of the things you might want to know if you are coming to the Youth Court, or just wondering how the Youth Court works.
Visit website›Ministry of Justice website with information on family issues including about going to court, forms and other times when you may need help.
Visit website›For information about courts and tribunals, including going to court, finding a court & collection of fines and reparation.
Visit website›On this site you will find information about our Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court including recent decisions, daily lists and news.
Visit website›